An interesting case study of how the state became a pariah
The suburban real estate market's development during 2015-17 didn't follow the traditional "cat in the bag" approach but instead adopted a new theory due to the conflicting demands of the state and construction economy. Various factors contribute to a city's real estate market growth, including the urban area's size, the number of buildings per capita, the number of new homes built per capita, and the population in a given location. Moreover, factors at the state and local levels that influence development include the location of real estate properties (e.g., apartment buildings, new housing developments) and the ability of development teams to independently determine the best path using internet information. The "cat in the bag" practice has roots in the 1980s, but in today's information technology era (still referring to the early 2000s), it has recently become feasible to independently evaluate the factors influencing the suburban real estate market. What's the pattern? Simply put, the more developed a city's infrastructure, the more likely a specific property will be purchased using parcel technology. This process is quick and straightforward, taking about 5-7 weeks. For country houses, such a comprehensive assessment helps quickly identify the real reasons for the market's state. What can I say? At the state and local levels, there's plenty of information available, but it's hard to focus on easy data. Specifically, finding information about the exact features of territories and roads that affect the real estate market's development is difficult. Therefore, I recommend that only those who have completed at least one stage of private investment in the country (from B to D) or have access to public information technology—a private partner (in case of investment) or a partnership—should proceed, having completed at least one stage of private investment. To date, there isn't a single "cat in a bag" case that hasn't already been addressed. What should you do if you don't have a real estate agency? First, contact a real estate agency. Second, remember that most private developers often don't disclose the future housing building developer's name, as this is a criminal offense. A three-month prison sentence is not an issue. Finally, the maximum penalty with a fake passport is three months imprisonment. Yet, most private developers refuse to construct any apartments in new housing projects. Why? Why do private developers face such challenges with adoption?